[directorist_add_listing]

GLL partners with Diabetes UK getting South London moving in 2026

For the third year running, Greenwich Leisure Limited (GLL) is partnering with Diabetes UK to help thousands of people get active to spread awareness for a great cause in 2026.

Having more than 250 Better leisure centres and sporting facilities across the UK including those in the South London boroughs of Croydon, Greenwich, Hammersmith and Fulham, Kensington and Chelsea, Lewisham, Merton, Richmond and Sutton, GLL is the UK’s largest charitable social enterprise dedicated to running public leisure and community services since its establishment in 1993.

Helping communities across South London stay active in 2026, Green Leisure Limited is championing a meaningful cause. By supporting two inspiring charity fundraising challenges, the Swim22 and One Million Step Challenge will be raising awareness of diabetes while encouraging people to take positive steps towards better health and wellbeing.

In order to challenge participants, GLL will be discounting leisure centre members for those taking part, holding online and in-person training events, and giving extra tips and advice to help people train safely.

The challenges aim to get people up and about moving which can help boost both physical and mental health all while raising money for a worthy cause.

Diabetes UK revealed that in the UK there are 4.6 million people who are now living with a diagnosis of diabetes- the highest number on record. Without the access to the right care and support, people with diabetes face an increased risk of developing serious complications.

In the UK each week, diabetes is linked to 184 amputations, over 770 strokes, 590 heart attacks and 2,300 cases of heart failure.

GLL’s Partnership Manager in Lewisham, Hannah Gilmour said,

“We’re proud to support Diabetes UK again and help even more people discover the benefits of getting active.

“With millions of people in the UK at risk of developing type 2 diabetes, staying active and maintaining a healthy weight can play an important role in reducing that risk. Challenges like Swim22 and the One Millions Step Challenge make it fun and motivating to move more while raising funds for an incredibly important cause.”

Swim22 invites participants to take on the distance between England and France by swimming at their own pace over a 12-week period starting on March 22nd. Meanwhile, the One Million Step Challenge motivates supporters to walk an average of 10,800 steps a day across three months from July. Both challenges also offer shorter-distance options, along with ongoing support and encouragement from Diabetes UK, with the additional backing from GLL.

James Beeby, Director of Engagement and Fundraising at Diabetes UK, said

“We’re delighted to partner with GLL again, to inspire more people to take on a new fundraising challenge.

“Being physically active plays an important role in overall health and wellbeing and events like Swim22 and the One Million Step Challenge make it fun, achievable, and rewards for everyone involved. Across the UK, Better leisure centres support their members to improve their physical and mental health and it is this shared aim that makes this collaboration so fitting.”

All funds raised through these challenges will support Diabetes UK in its vital work to fund life-saving research and helping people living with diabetes access the care and support they need.

Brentford 2-2 Wolves: Late Drama at the Gtech as Brentford Let Victory Slip Away

Brentford were left frustrated after surrendering a commanding two-goal lead to draw 2–2 with Wolverhampton Wanderers in an absorbing Premier League clash at the Gtech Community Stadium, a match filled with attacking quality, dramatic momentum shifts and late tension that kept supporters on the edge of their seats until the final whistle. What had begun as a potentially decisive step toward European qualification for the home side ultimately became a story of missed opportunities and resilience, as Wolves fought back with determination to claim a valuable point in their battle to avoid relegation.

The match began with Brentford playing with urgency and confidence, fully aware of the significance of the fixture in the context of their season. From the outset, the home side pressed high up the pitch, forcing Wolves into hurried clearances and looking to establish dominance through energetic movement in midfield and attack. Brentford’s intensity unsettled their opponents early on, and it was not long before they were rewarded for their positive start.

The opening goal arrived after a spell of sustained pressure, with Michael Kayode seizing his moment to make an important contribution. The defender pushed forward at the right time, finding space inside the penalty area before calmly finishing to give Brentford an early advantage. The strike sparked celebration among the home supporters and seemed to set the tone for what looked like a comfortable evening for the Bees.

Buoyed by the breakthrough, Brentford continued to attack with purpose. Their passing was sharp, their movement fluid and their belief evident. Igor Thiago, enjoying a prolific campaign in front of goal, played a central role in the home side’s attacking threat. His ability to hold up play, combine with teammates and create space for himself made him a constant challenge for the Wolves defence.

Brentford doubled their lead midway through the first half when Thiago added another goal to his impressive tally for the season. The move that led to the strike showcased the home side’s attacking cohesion, as a direct ball forward created an opening that Thiago exploited with composure. His finish not only extended Brentford’s advantage but also reinforced the sense that the match was slipping beyond Wolves’ control.

At that stage, the hosts appeared capable of adding further goals. Thiago came close to scoring again when he struck the woodwork with a powerful effort, and Wolves struggled to cope with the pace and intensity of Brentford’s forward play. The visitors seemed disjointed, unable to build meaningful attacks and frequently forced into defensive positions that left them vulnerable.

Yet football often turns on moments, and just before the interval Wolves found the spark that would ignite their comeback. Adam Armstrong produced a moment of quality to pull one goal back, finishing decisively to reduce the deficit and give his team renewed belief. The timing of the goal proved crucial, as it shifted the psychological balance heading into halftime and ensured that Brentford could not relax despite their earlier dominance.

The second half unfolded with a noticeably different rhythm. Wolves emerged from the dressing room with increased determination, pressing higher up the pitch and showing greater confidence in possession. Their midfield began to disrupt Brentford’s passing patterns, while their attackers tested the home defence with more purposeful runs and crosses.

Brentford, by contrast, appeared to lose some of the sharpness that had characterised their first-half performance. Their attempts to regain control were often met with determined resistance from Wolves, who were now playing with urgency and belief. The visitors also enjoyed moments of fortune, striking the woodwork on more than one occasion as they pushed for an equaliser.

The decisive phase of the match arrived in the closing stages when Wolves’ persistence finally paid off. Substitute Tolu Arokodare, introduced to provide fresh attacking impetus, made an immediate impact. Rising above defenders inside the penalty area, he directed a header beyond the goalkeeper to level the score and complete a remarkable turnaround. The equaliser sparked jubilant celebrations among the visiting players and supporters, who sensed the importance of the moment in their fight for survival.

With the match now finely balanced, both teams sought a dramatic late winner. Wolves came close to completing the comeback when Arokodare struck the crossbar with another effort, while Brentford also had opportunities to reclaim the lead. One of the most notable came when Reiss Nelson found himself in a promising position during stoppage time, only to see his attempt fail to find the target.

When the final whistle sounded, the contrasting emotions of the two sides were clear. Brentford’s players looked visibly disappointed, aware that they had allowed a golden opportunity to secure three points slip from their grasp. Wolves, meanwhile, celebrated a hard-earned draw that could prove vital in boosting morale during a challenging campaign.

The result also carried wider implications for the league standings. Brentford remained in the race for European qualification but knew that dropping points from such a commanding position could prove costly in the long run. Wolves, still positioned near the bottom of the table, took encouragement from their resilience and continued improvement in recent weeks.

After the match, Brentford manager Keith Andrews spoke candidly about his side’s performance. He acknowledged that the team had been excellent during the first half, creating chances and controlling the tempo of the game. However, he also admitted that the basics of game management had not been executed effectively after the break. According to Andrews, conceding momentum to the opposition allowed Wolves to grow in confidence, ultimately leading to the comeback.

He emphasised the need for greater concentration and consistency, particularly when protecting a lead. Andrews also highlighted the importance of maintaining composure under pressure, suggesting that lessons must be learned if Brentford are to sustain their push for a historic European place. Despite the frustration, he praised the attacking quality his players displayed and expressed confidence that they could respond positively in upcoming fixtures.

Wolves manager Rob Edwards, in contrast, praised his team’s determination and spirit. He described the comeback as evidence of the squad’s resilience and belief, noting that falling two goals behind could easily have led to a heavy defeat. Instead, he credited his players for remaining organised, adapting tactically and continuing to fight for every opportunity.

Edwards also spoke about the impact of substitutions, particularly the introduction of Arokodare, whose equalising goal and overall presence added a new dimension to Wolves’ attack. He suggested that performances like this can build momentum and help create a positive mindset as the club seeks to improve its league position. While acknowledging that survival remains a difficult challenge, he insisted that results like this demonstrate the team’s capacity to compete with higher-placed opponents.

For supporters inside the stadium, the match provided an emotional rollercoaster. Brentford fans experienced the excitement of early dominance and the disappointment of seeing victory slip away, while Wolves supporters celebrated a display of character that offered hope for the remainder of the season.

The contest also highlighted the unpredictable nature of Premier League football. A match that seemed firmly in Brentford’s control during the first half evolved into a dramatic struggle in which momentum shifted repeatedly. The ability of Wolves to respond under pressure and the inability of Brentford to maintain their earlier intensity combined to produce an outcome that reflected the fine margins of elite competition.

As both teams look ahead, the lessons from this encounter will likely influence their preparations and priorities. Brentford will aim to refine their defensive organisation and decision-making in key moments, while Wolves will seek to build on the confidence gained from their comeback. Ultimately, the 2–2 draw served as a reminder that persistence, adaptability and mental strength can shape the outcome of even the most challenging matches.

In a season where every point carries significant weight, this dramatic encounter may come to be seen as a defining moment for both clubs. Brentford’s pursuit of European qualification remains alive but more uncertain, while Wolves’ fight for survival continues with renewed belief. What is certain is that this match delivered the kind of excitement and unpredictability that makes top-flight football so compelling, leaving players and supporters alike reflecting on an evening of drama long after the final whistle.

European Hope Meets Survival Fight as Brentford Host Resurgent Wolves

There is a particular edge to a Monday night Premier League fixture in mid-March, especially when one club is looking up the table and the other is trying to drag itself clear of danger. Brentford welcome Wolverhampton Wanderers to the Gtech Community Stadium on 16 March with both teams carrying very different objectives into the game, yet both arriving with enough recent evidence to believe the evening can push their season in a better direction.

The fixture is scheduled for an 8pm kick-off, and the context is clear enough. Keith Andrews’ Brentford are still chasing the possibility of a first European qualification in the club’s history, while Rob Edwards brings a Wolves side to west London that remains bottom of the table but has finally shown signs of life after a difficult campaign.

For the home side, the immediate challenge is as much emotional as tactical. Brentford’s last match in any competition ended in FA Cup disappointment, with a 2-2 draw at West Ham United followed by a 5-3 defeat on penalties in the fifth round. It was a draining exit, not just because of the manner of the loss but because Brentford had shown enough attacking quality to believe they could progress. Igor Thiago scored twice across the tie, once through a deflected header and once from the penalty spot, and the game only slipped away in the shootout after Dango Ouattara’s failed Panenka. Andrews admitted afterwards that the squad had needed to dust themselves down from both the physical toll of 120 minutes and the emotional blow of going out in that way. It is exactly the sort of cup defeat that can either linger or sharpen a league performance a week later.

That cup exit, though, should not obscure the more useful league picture Brentford have built in the weeks leading into this fixture. Their most recent Premier League outing brought a 0-0 draw away to Bournemouth, a result that owed more to defensive resilience than attacking fluency but still offered a timely reminder of the grit Andrews has tried to preserve in this team. Brentford kept their seventh clean sheet of the season on the south coast and did so despite Bournemouth creating the better chances, with Marcus Tavernier twice hitting the woodwork and Caoimhin Kelleher forced into important work. The head coach afterwards praised the collective resilience of the performance, particularly without the ball, and Nathan Collins spoke of the “grit” needed to leave with a point. Before that came a 4-3 win over Burnley, which means Brentford have taken four points from their last three league games, although that run also includes the 2-0 home defeat to Brighton referenced in Wolves’ official preview. In other words, the trend is neither flawless nor flat. It is mixed, but it still leaves Brentford in seventh and firmly in the conversation for a strong finish.

Wolves travel south with a different type of momentum. Their last game in any competition was the 3-1 FA Cup defeat to Liverpool on 6 March, a result that ended their interest in the competition but did not entirely erase the progress they had made in league action just days earlier. Rob Edwards’ side were level at half-time against Liverpool before conceding twice early in the second period, and although Hwang Hee-chan pulled one back in stoppage time, the tie had already slipped beyond them. What mattered more in the broader sense was that the cup defeat came directly after a far more significant result in the league: a dramatic 2-1 victory over Liverpool at Molineux, secured by goals from Rodrigo Gomes and Andre. That was not an isolated improvement either. Wolves’ own preview for this Brentford game notes that they are unbeaten in their last two Premier League matches, thanks to home wins over Aston Villa and Liverpool, and had also taken a point against Arsenal the previous month. For a team still bottom of the table, that is the first sustained sign for some time that belief may not be misplaced.

What makes the fixture especially interesting is the contrast in where the confidence comes from. Brentford’s case is rooted in league position, in the reality that they are seventh and still close enough to think about Europe, and in the knowledge that this is a home game against a side still at the foot of the table. Wolves, by contrast, are drawing confidence from something more elemental. They are not leaning on their overall season record, because that would offer little comfort. Instead, Edwards has tapped into recent spirit, recent energy and the evidence that his side can frustrate and punish strong opponents when they remain organised. His own club site has framed it as “a different energy across the board”, and the recent wins over Villa and Liverpool back that up. This match, then, is not simply seventh against bottom. It is a meeting between a side expected to control the occasion and another that increasingly believes the season is not gone after all.

Injury news adds another layer to the story and, on the Brentford side, the updates are significant enough to shape both team selection and the broader mood. Rico Henry has been ruled out for numerous weeks after suffering what Andrews described as a “decent hamstring injury” in the draw at Bournemouth, where he had to come off after an early sprint. Aaron Hickey remains sidelined with a hamstring issue, Vitaly Janelt is still out with a metatarsal injury, Josh Dasilva continues his recovery from knee ligament trouble, and both Fábio Carvalho and Antoni Milambo are set to miss the rest of the season because of ACL injuries. The best news for the Bees is that Reiss Nelson has returned to the training group and was set to be assessed for possible involvement, but even that is being treated carefully rather than as a certainty. Brentford are not stripped bare, but they are undeniably light in some positions, particularly around the left side and midfield depth.

Wolves have fewer immediate fitness worries, which is not a phrase that has often been associated with their season. Edwards is close to having a fully fit and available squad again, with Andre back in contention after the suspension that kept him out of the FA Cup loss to Liverpool. The one genuine concern is goalkeeper Jose Sa, who missed that cup tie because of an ankle knock. Wolves’ own preview described him as the only injury issue facing the head coach this weekend, while the Premier League’s line-up notes reported Edwards as “really hopeful” that Sa would be available even though he was still sore. That leaves Wolves in a relatively healthy place compared with many points in the season, and when a team at the bottom finally gets rhythm and bodies back at the same time, matches begin to feel more dangerous for opponents who might otherwise look at the table and relax.

In-form players are central to any preview of this match, and Brentford have a few obvious names. Thiago stands out most sharply. Wolves’ official preview for the game lists him on 21 goals this season, while recent reporting around the West Ham cup tie highlighted that his all-competition tally had kept rising and that he had reached 18 in the league. Those numbers alone explain why Brentford remain so awkward to contain even on days when they do not fully dominate. He is strong enough to occupy defenders, sharp enough to finish in the box and dependable enough from the spot to tilt tight matches. There is also a broader threat around him. Ouattara has six assists according to the Wolves preview, and Mikkel Damsgaard’s creative contribution has gathered attention too. Brentford’s own FPL Scout piece noted that Damsgaard created 10 big chances this season despite starting only 16 of 28 matches at that point, a total beaten by only four players in the league. When Andrews talks about dusting the squad down after cup disappointment, he will at least do so knowing there is enough attacking craft and end product in the group to change the mood quickly.

Wolves do not have the same volume of attacking numbers, but recent form still offers some clear danger signs for Brentford. Rodrigo Gomes has five goals this season, and the timing of his contributions has made them feel even more important than the raw number suggests. He scored in the league win over Liverpool and, according to the club’s own coverage, also starred off the bench in the previous victory over Aston Villa. Andre may be a midfielder first, but his late winner against Liverpool and his broader all-round game have become increasingly important. Brentford’s own official match preview noted that among central midfielders with 1,500 or more Premier League minutes in 2025/26, only Chelsea’s Moises Caicedo had a better pass completion rate than Andre’s 91 per cent, while the Brazilian also ranks in the division’s top 20 for tackles won. Hwang, meanwhile, has three assists and comes into the game having scored against Liverpool in the cup. That is not the profile of a free-scoring side, but it is enough to suggest Brentford cannot assume the threat will come only from one source.

Tactically, the shape of the contest feels quite easy to sketch, even if the finer details will depend on selection. Brentford should expect to have more of the territorial initiative, particularly at home, and there will be a demand from the crowd to push Wolves back, recycle possession quickly and test a defence that has spent much of the season under pressure. Andrews’ side still carries the physical identity that has defined the club in the Premier League era: strong from set pieces, aggressive in duels and willing to play percentages when a cleaner route to goal does not present itself. That matters because Brentford are not a side that needs every phase to be intricate. They can build, but they can also force second balls and thrive on broken moments. Wolves, meanwhile, are more likely to look for discipline first and moments second. The evidence of the last few weeks suggests Edwards has made them harder to play through, while also encouraging quicker, more decisive attacking transitions once the ball is won. If Brentford score early, that plan becomes much harder to execute. If the game remains level deep into the second half, the pressure may shift onto the home side.

Recent history offers Brentford a measure of reassurance, because they won the reverse fixture 2-0 at Molineux in December. Yet even that detail comes with a warning attached, because Wolves are not in quite the same emotional place they were then. Brentford’s own coverage of this meeting openly acknowledges that while the Bees did win in the reverse game, the visitors have found some recent good form. That is a sensible framing of the tie. On seasonal evidence Brentford remain the more stable and more accomplished side. On very recent evidence Wolves are arriving with the sharper sense of urgency and perhaps the more dangerous edge. One team is trying to keep a European conversation alive, the other to keep a survival bid alive. It is not difficult to see why the stakes should produce a tense evening.

What seems most likely is a contest decided by margins rather than by one side completely overwhelming the other. Brentford have the stronger league position, the home setting and the more reliable goalscorer in Thiago, but they are also coming off a painful cup exit and carrying multiple absences. Wolves are still winless away in the league according to their official preview, which is an important caution against overstating their revival, yet back-to-back Premier League wins over Aston Villa and Liverpool are substantial evidence that they can no longer be treated as a soft opponent. By the time kick-off arrives, the table will still make Brentford favourites. The mood around the division, though, suggests this is far from straightforward. A side with Europe in mind faces one with survival on the line, and both can point to recent performances as proof that the night should matter for much more than three ordinary points.

Liverpool 1-1 Spurs: Richarlison’s Late Strike Denies Reds as Spurs Snatch Dramatic Draw

Liverpool were left to rue missed opportunities after being held to a dramatic 1–1 draw by Tottenham Hotspur at Anfield in a fiercely contested Premier League encounter that swung from early dominance to late heartbreak for the home side. In a match filled with tension, tactical adjustments and moments of high-quality attacking play, Dominik Szoboszlai’s first-half free-kick gave Liverpool the lead before Richarlison struck in the final minute to earn Tottenham a vital point that could prove significant in their fight to climb away from the relegation zone.

The contest carried major implications for both clubs. Liverpool entered the game aiming to reassert their push toward the top four and maintain momentum in a tightly contested race for European qualification. Tottenham, meanwhile, arrived on Merseyside under pressure after a difficult run of results that had left them hovering uncomfortably close to the bottom of the table. The atmosphere inside Anfield reflected the stakes, with supporters expecting a strong performance from the home side and aware that any dropped points could prove costly.

From the opening whistle, Liverpool appeared intent on taking control. Their midfield pressed aggressively, winning possession high up the pitch and attempting to disrupt Tottenham’s rhythm before the visitors could establish any sustained attacking patterns. The early tempo set by the home side pinned Spurs deep in their own half, forcing them to defend compactly and rely on quick counterattacks whenever space became available.

Despite Liverpool’s early pressure, Tottenham showed glimpses of attacking threat. Richarlison’s movement caused occasional concern for the home defence, while long passes from deeper areas sought to exploit gaps behind Liverpool’s advancing full-backs. However, these moments were sporadic, and for much of the first half Liverpool maintained territorial dominance.

The breakthrough arrived in the 18th minute and showcased both technical quality and opportunism. Awarded a free-kick in a promising position, Szoboszlai stepped forward with confidence and curled a powerful effort toward goal. The strike took Tottenham goalkeeper Guglielmo Vicario by surprise, and although he attempted to react, the ball found the net to give Liverpool a deserved lead.

The goal lifted the mood among the home supporters and seemed to validate Liverpool’s assertive start. With the advantage secured, the Reds continued to push forward, seeking to build on their momentum. Their attacking play often flowed through quick combinations in central areas, with forwards drifting into pockets of space to create shooting opportunities. Several promising moves ended with attempts that either lacked precision or were blocked by determined Tottenham defenders.

For Spurs, conceding early could have easily led to a collapse, particularly given their recent struggles. Instead, the visitors gradually began to settle into the game. They tightened their defensive structure, limited Liverpool’s ability to penetrate the penalty area and began to string together passes that relieved pressure and allowed them to regain composure.

As the first half progressed, Liverpool remained the more dangerous side. Their pressing forced turnovers, and they came close to doubling their advantage on multiple occasions. One particularly notable moment saw a powerful effort from inside the box crash against the woodwork, leaving the crowd convinced a second goal was imminent. Yet Tottenham survived the scare and continued to battle for every ball.

The interval arrived with Liverpool still leading but aware that their failure to extend the margin could invite danger later in the match. Tottenham’s players, meanwhile, regrouped in the dressing room with renewed belief that persistence and discipline could eventually yield an opportunity.

The second half began with Liverpool again attempting to dictate the tempo. They circulated possession confidently, probing for weaknesses in Tottenham’s defensive setup. However, Spurs displayed increasing resilience, with midfielders dropping deeper to support the back line and disrupt Liverpool’s passing lanes. This tactical shift gradually reduced the frequency of clear-cut chances for the home side.

Liverpool head coach Arne Slot made changes in personnel as the game progressed, introducing fresh attacking options in an effort to maintain intensity. The adjustments brought renewed energy and created brief spells of sustained pressure. Tottenham, though, continued to defend resolutely, with Vicario making important interventions to keep his team within reach of an equaliser.

As the clock ticked into the final quarter-hour, the psychological dynamics of the match began to shift. Liverpool’s urgency grew as they sought the security of a second goal, while Tottenham sensed that a single moment could transform the outcome. The visitors began committing more players forward, launching attacks that tested Liverpool’s defensive concentration.

In the closing stages, the tension inside Anfield became palpable. Every misplaced pass or missed opportunity from the home side was met with audible frustration from the stands. Tottenham, sensing the mounting anxiety, pushed forward with greater determination. Richarlison, who had been lively throughout, continued to make intelligent runs and challenge Liverpool’s defenders.

The decisive moment arrived in stoppage time. Tottenham worked the ball forward in a swift move that caught Liverpool slightly off balance. A pass into the penalty area found Richarlison, who reacted quickly to steer his finish beyond the goalkeeper and into the net. The equaliser stunned the home crowd and sparked jubilant celebrations among the visiting players and supporters.

For Liverpool, the late concession felt like a crushing blow. Having controlled large portions of the match and created several opportunities, they were suddenly faced with the reality of sharing the points. The final whistle soon followed, confirming a result that left both teams with mixed emotions — Tottenham relieved and encouraged, Liverpool frustrated and reflective.

After the game, Arne Slot spoke candidly about his side’s disappointment. He acknowledged that Liverpool had produced enough chances to secure victory but emphasised the importance of converting opportunities when they arise. The manager also pointed to lapses in concentration during the closing moments, noting that such errors can prove costly in a league as competitive as the Premier League. While he praised the overall performance in terms of intensity and organisation, he admitted that conceding another late goal highlighted areas that require improvement.

Slot also discussed the emotional aspect of the result, recognising the expectations placed upon the team by supporters. He stressed that maintaining focus and composure will be essential as Liverpool continue their push for European qualification. Despite the setback, he expressed confidence that his squad possesses the quality and determination needed to respond positively in upcoming fixtures.

Tottenham manager Igor Tudor, by contrast, described the draw as a significant step forward for his team. He praised the players’ resilience in continuing to fight despite falling behind early and enduring sustained pressure. Tudor emphasised that belief and unity had been crucial factors in the late comeback, suggesting that the result could mark a turning point in Tottenham’s season.

He also highlighted Richarlison’s contribution, commending the striker’s work rate and composure in front of goal. According to Tudor, performances like this demonstrate the character within the squad and provide a platform upon which to build confidence in the weeks ahead. While acknowledging that there is still much work to be done, he insisted that securing a point at a venue like Anfield should be viewed as a positive achievement.

Beyond the immediate aftermath, the match carried broader implications for both clubs. Liverpool’s inability to convert dominance into victory underscored the fine margins that often shape outcomes at the highest level. The result also served as a reminder that maintaining concentration until the final whistle is essential, particularly against opponents capable of seizing late opportunities.

For Tottenham, the draw offered a measure of relief after a difficult run of form. It demonstrated that even amid adversity, determination and tactical discipline can yield rewards. The point gained at Anfield may prove valuable in the context of their campaign, providing momentum as they strive to climb the table and distance themselves from relegation danger.

Supporters from both sides will remember the encounter as a match of shifting emotions. Liverpool fans experienced the excitement of an early lead and the frustration of missed chances, only to see victory slip away in the dying moments. Tottenham’s followers, meanwhile, endured long periods of defensive tension before erupting in celebration at the dramatic equaliser.

Ultimately, the contest encapsulated the unpredictability and intensity that define Premier League football. A single moment — Szoboszlai’s free-kick brilliance or Richarlison’s late intervention — can shape the narrative of an entire afternoon. For Liverpool, the challenge now lies in transforming disappointment into motivation. For Tottenham, the task will be to build on newfound confidence and translate resilience into consistent results.

As the season moves toward its decisive stages, both teams will look back on this encounter as a reminder that perseverance, focus and clinical finishing are often the difference between triumph and frustration. On this occasion, Liverpool were left to reflect on what might have been, while Tottenham departed Anfield with renewed belief that their campaign can still take a positive turn.

Crystal Palace Frustrated by 10-Man Leeds in Goalless Selhurst Park Stalemate

Crystal Palace were held to a frustrating 0-0 draw by ten-man Leeds United at Selhurst Park in a Premier League contest that featured a missed penalty, a controversial red card and sustained second-half pressure from the home side that ultimately failed to produce a breakthrough.

Played in front of a crowd of 25,155 in South London, the match produced moments of drama but no goals, leaving both teams to settle for a point in a fixture that carried importance as the season moves toward its closing weeks.

Crystal Palace entered the match looking to build momentum and strengthen their position in the middle of the Premier League table. Leeds United, meanwhile, arrived hoping to secure a positive result away from home and continue collecting valuable points as they navigate the final stretch of the campaign.

The visitors started the match with confidence and created the first meaningful attacking moment of the afternoon. Leeds looked sharp during early transitions and forced Palace into several defensive interventions as they pushed forward through midfield.

The biggest opportunity of the first half arrived shortly before the interval when Leeds were awarded a penalty following a handball from Will Hughes inside the Crystal Palace penalty area. After a lengthy check by the referee, the decision stood and Leeds striker Dominic Calvert-Lewin stepped forward to take the spot kick.

It proved to be a crucial moment in the match. Calvert-Lewin struck his penalty wide of the post, missing the chance to give Leeds a valuable lead just before halftime and allowing Palace to escape what could have been a significant setback.

The drama did not end there. Deep into first-half stoppage time Leeds defender Gabriel Gudmundsson was shown a second yellow card for a foul that halted a Crystal Palace counterattack, reducing the visitors to ten men before the break. The dismissal added another layer of tension to the match and set up a second half in which Palace were expected to dominate possession.

With the numerical advantage and the backing of the Selhurst Park crowd, Oliver Glasner’s side pushed forward after the restart and began to take control of the game. Palace moved the ball with greater urgency through midfield and attempted to stretch the Leeds defence by pushing players into wide areas.

Despite their control of possession, clear chances remained difficult to create. Leeds reorganised quickly after the red card and adopted a compact defensive shape that made it difficult for Palace to find space in dangerous areas.

Statistically, the home side began to assert themselves as the second half progressed. Crystal Palace finished the match with 59 percent possession compared to Leeds’ 41 percent, reflecting their territorial dominance after the break. The Eagles also recorded 13 shots during the match while Leeds managed nine attempts of their own.

However, the key statistic that highlighted the difficulty Palace faced was the number of shots on target. Despite their control of possession and attacking territory, the home side managed just four efforts on target, while Leeds registered three.

Jean-Philippe Mateta led the line for Palace and worked tirelessly to hold up the ball and bring teammates into attacking positions. The French forward battled physically with Leeds defenders Joe Rodon and Pascal Struijk, but the visiting back line remained disciplined throughout the contest.

Midfielders Jefferson Lerma and Adam Wharton attempted to increase the tempo of Palace’s attacks by moving the ball quickly into advanced areas, while the home side also looked to exploit width in an effort to pull the Leeds defence out of shape.

Leeds, however, defended with determination and organisation. Even with ten men they continued to compete strongly in midfield and remained a threat on occasional counterattacks. Captain Ethan Ampadu played a key role in protecting the defence, helping his side maintain structure under sustained pressure.

As the match entered the final stages Palace increased their attacking intent. Crosses were delivered into the Leeds penalty area and the home side pushed additional players forward in search of a late winning goal. Corners also provided opportunities, with Palace finishing the match having won six compared to Leeds’ five.

Despite those efforts, Leeds continued to frustrate their hosts. Goalkeeper Karl Darlow and the Leeds defensive line produced a series of important interventions to keep the score level as Palace pressed forward in the closing minutes.

The physical nature of the contest was reflected in the foul count, with Leeds committing fourteen fouls compared to Palace’s eleven. The visitors also received one yellow card in addition to Gudmundsson’s sending-off, while Palace collected two bookings during the match.

Ultimately, neither side could find the decisive moment needed to secure victory. For Crystal Palace the result was a source of frustration given their numerical advantage and territorial dominance during the second half. For Leeds United, however, the draw represented a hard-earned point achieved through resilience and defensive discipline.

The final whistle was greeted with relief from the Leeds players, who had been forced to defend for long periods after the red card. Daniel Farke’s side showed determination and organisation to withstand the pressure and leave Selhurst Park with a valuable result.

Crystal Palace will feel they missed an opportunity to secure all three points, particularly after controlling possession for much of the second half. The inability to convert attacking pressure into clear chances ultimately prevented them from capitalising on their advantage.

Leeds, meanwhile, will take encouragement from the defensive performance displayed after Gudmundsson’s dismissal. Playing an entire half with ten men is rarely easy in the Premier League, yet the visitors managed to remain organised and disciplined enough to keep Palace at bay.

Matches between Crystal Palace and Leeds United have often been closely contested, and this encounter proved no different. Although the match lacked goals, it delivered tension and drama, highlighted by the missed penalty, the red card and the late pressure from the home side.

As the Premier League season continues to unfold, both teams will look back on the contest as a moment where resilience and missed opportunities shaped the outcome. Crystal Palace leave the match wondering what might have been, while Leeds depart South London satisfied with a point earned through determination and collective effort.

Tamsin Greig leads all-star cast for one-night Shakespeare’s Women performance

Actors including Tamsin Greig and Peter Wight will headline a one-night staging of Shakespeare’s Women later this month in support of a leading domestic abuse charity.

The performance will take place at The Exchange Twickenham on 20 March, with proceeds supporting Refuge.

Written by Lorien Haynes and directed by Jude Kelly, the play reimagines eight female characters from the works of William Shakespeare in a modern-day domestic abuse support group.

The production previously premiered in two sold-out readings at Shakespeare’s Globe in 2024.

The dark comedy transports Shakespeare’s women from the 16th century to the present day, placing them together in a group session where they meet, share stories and gradually reveal their experiences.

Organisers say the play explores what might happen if Shakespeare’s female characters survived their original narratives and confronted the realities of modern life.

Greig will be joined in the cast by Wight, Nia Towle, Daisy Bevan and Hudson Harden Scheel, a recent graduate of the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland. Further casting announcements are expected.

Becky Shaw, programme and partnerships manager at The Exchange, said the production aims to highlight the impact of domestic abuse while supporting Refuge’s work.

“Lorien’s play is a response to the devastation of those suffering from the impact of domestic abuse, and we’re thrilled to be hosting Shakespeare’s Women at The Exchange to support the work of Refuge,” she said.

“The stellar cast line-up of highly acclaimed actors teamed with up-coming stars of tomorrow promises a compelling performance from this powerhouse company.”

The performance forms part of The Exchange’s programme around International Women’s Day and will be followed by a discussion featuring Kelly, Haynes, members of the cast and a representative from Refuge.

Refuge supports thousands of women and children across the UK, providing specialist services to help survivors escape abuse and rebuild their lives.

ScottishPower’s record-breaking apprentice applications show energy industry is the place to be

More people than ever before are looking to kickstart their careers in the energy industry, with ScottishPower receiving a record-breaking number of applications for its 2026 apprenticeship programme.

The green energy company has received more than 6,000 applications for the 150 roles on offer across its businesses – including SP Energy Networks and SP Electricity North West – with opportunities available from Annan to Anglesey, Motherwell to Manchester, and Stirling to Stockport.

The level of interest – a 25% increase on 2025 – reflects the diversity and variety of the apprenticeships available across ScottishPower as it takes forward its £24 billion investment programme to rewire the grid and build more clean power, expanding the workforce from 6,500 to 11,000 by 2030.

Roles include data science, engineering, fitting, jointing, logistics, overhead lines, project management and software engineering.

Sarah McNulty, ScottishPower’s UK People Director, said: “We’ve been blown away by the response to this year’s apprenticeship programme, which confirms what we’ve always known – that the energy industry is the place to be. It’s also testament to the success of the thousands of apprentices who have come before and progressed into long-term careers across our different businesses.

“Our apprenticeship programme has gone from strength to strength in recent years, more than trebling the apprenticeship routes on offer as we build the workforce for a clean energy future. We’ve also extended the opportunities available from the more traditional ‘hard hat, hi vis’ engineering roles to the tech and commercial skills needed today.

“It’s a really exciting time to join the energy industry and our apprenticeship programme is just one way we’re building careers, shaping futures, and creating a legacy that we will all benefit from for years to come. Good luck to all our applicants.”

More than 450 apprentices are currently working across ScottishPower and looking forward to welcoming the new cohort later this year.

Robyn McKenzie (23) from Edinburgh is a recent project management apprenticeship with SP Energy Networks where she worked on everything from operational projects to the company’s £12 billion transmission investment plan. She said: “I’ve had such amazing opportunities throughout my apprenticeship, and the culture of the business has always been supportive and development-focused. This programme has given me exposure, knowledge and strategic insight I’d never have gained in a standard role, so it’s no surprise so many people want to get involved.”

Erin Lovett (22) from Wrexham is a first-year logistics apprentice – and a semi-professional player with Wrexham AFC Women. In her ScottishPower role, she is learning how to manage stores and resources to ensure engineers have the right equipment when needed so they can get to work immediately in the event of a power cut. She said: “This is such a brilliant programme that allows you to earn a good salary while you learn. The people and opportunities really stand out, alongside a strong and supportive network. I can already see that ScottishPower is somewhere to build and make your career and will offer so many chances to go anywhere and do anything. I’m really excited to be here.”

Chloe Winder (27) from Preston is due to complete her two-year cybersecurity technologist apprenticeship in mid-2026. Chloe is part of the cybersecurity engineering team at SP Electricity North West, helping to configure, manage and monitor the deployed security tooling across the network. She said: “My apprenticeship has given me hands‑on skills in a culture that supports growth and learning. It has opened doors to meaningful opportunities, from contributing to live security work to exploring different specialisms, while steadily growing both my technical knowledge and the confidence I need to thrive in cybersecurity.”

West Ham 1-1 Man City: Hammers Stand Tall As City’s Title Chase Loses More Air At The London Stadium

Manchester City came to east London knowing the arithmetic was brutal and the psychology arguably worse. Arsenal had already beaten Everton, Pep Guardiola had warned beforehand that dropped points could make the title race feel finished, and City were playing with that familiar obligation that turns every touch heavy when the margin for error disappears.
What followed was not a collapse, not even a bad performance in the crude sense, but something far more damaging. It was an evening in which City had the ball, the territory, the shots, the corners and the sense of control, yet somehow left with only a draw and a title challenge looking thinner by the minute. West Ham, meanwhile, produced exactly the kind of result that can keep a club alive. They held firm, suffered, defended their box with conviction, and found one moment to punish City’s weakness. The 1-1 draw moved West Ham out of the bottom three and left City nine points behind Arsenal, albeit with a game in hand.  
This was a game that looked tactically lopsided from the start. West Ham set up in a 3-4-2-1 and made it clear that their first task was to survive the waves. City lined up in a 4-1-3-2, monopolised possession, pinned West Ham back and spent long stretches probing the outside of the block, trying to drag open one of those channels they so often find through repetition alone. The first few minutes felt like a siege.
City won corners inside four and five minutes, Rayan Ait-Nouri had an effort blocked from a central position, and the pattern was established almost immediately: Rodri dictating the tempo, Bernardo Silva and Omar Marmoush drifting into pockets, Haaland waiting for the one clean service line that never quite arrived often enough. West Ham were having to do the ugly work from the first whistle, but there was honesty and discipline in it. They did not try to be clever. They tried to be compact, committed and obnoxious to play against, and for long periods that was enough.  
City’s pressure eventually produced what looked like the breakthrough that might break the whole contest open. On 31 minutes Bernardo Silva, working from a difficult angle on the left after Marmoush’s involvement in the move, sent a delivery that ended up arcing in at the far side. Whether it was an attempted shot, a disguised cross or one of those happy accidents football loves to pretend were genius is almost beside the point. It put City ahead and, at that moment, the game seemed to be taking the expected shape.
West Ham had barely advanced far enough to breathe, let alone threaten. Marmoush had already sent a free-kick wide, Haaland had headed off target from an Ait-Nouri cross, and City looked set to settle into the kind of suffocating control that drains belief from opponents. But this West Ham side under Nuno has become more resilient than the one that staggered through the first half of the season, and the response came almost immediately. Four minutes later Jarrod Bowen swung over a corner, Gianluigi Donnarumma failed to deal with it, and Konstantinos Mavropanos rose from point-blank range to head West Ham level. City had dominated everything, but West Ham found the one phase of the game where domination means nothing if you lose your nerve.  
That goal changed the emotional weather of the match. Suddenly City were not calmly protecting a lead, they were back in a familiar argument with themselves. The second half became a study in pressure without peace. Marmoush dragged one wide early after the restart, then Guardiola’s changes began as Jérémy Doku and Rayan Cherki arrived on the hour in an attempt to inject pace, dribbling and unpredictability into a side that had become slightly mechanical. The changes did sharpen City. Haaland forced a save from Hermansen, Khusanov headed over, Matheus Nunes was denied from close range, Marc Guéhi headed wide, Haaland scuffed another chance off target after Doku’s work, Bernardo had an effort blocked, Cherki was denied high to the goalkeeper’s right, Reijnders forced another excellent save, and the closing minutes turned into a scramble of ricochets, headers, blocks and near-misses. Nico O’Reilly had a close-range header saved on 90 minutes, Guéhi missed twice in the dying moments, and Cherki also came close with a mis-hit free-kick that grazed the bar. The stats tell the story in cold language: 71.3 per cent possession for City, 24 shot attempts to West Ham’s one, 15 corners to one, six shots on target to one. The warmer truth is that City were forever threatening and never quite convincing.  
West Ham deserve an enormous amount of credit because defending like that is not passive, no matter what possession figures say. It takes concentration, courage and timing, and too often such performances get lazily described as mere resistance when in reality they are full of decisions that have to be made at speed and under extreme stress. Mavropanos scored the equaliser, but he also spent the afternoon throwing himself into the kind of work that keeps a point alive. Axel Disasi and Jean-Clair Todibo helped hold the central spaces together, Aaron Wan-Bissaka and El Hadji Malick Diouf had to defend enormous stretches of width, and Hermansen was the calmest man in the stadium whenever City finally did find a gap. His five saves were not all spectacular in the circus sense, but they were authoritative, timely and clean, which mattered enormously because one of the ways City bury sides is by forcing panic from repeated entries into the box. West Ham never quite gave them that panic. Even when West Ham were barely able to string passes together, the shape remained, the distances remained, and the willingness to throw bodies into the final few yards remained. For a team fighting near the bottom, that is not a small thing. That is identity.  
There was also intelligence in the way West Ham chose their moments. They did not create much, and nobody should pretend otherwise, but Bowen’s work was important beyond the assist because he kept giving West Ham a route out, however brief, while Valentín Castellanos battled for scraps and Pablo, then Soungoutou Magassa, helped protect the middle. This was not a glamorous West Ham performance, but it was a mature one. They understood the game they were in and played that game rather than some imaginary prettier version of it. That matters in relegation fights. You do not climb out of danger by chasing applause. You climb out by collecting afternoons like this, where everyone knows their job, nobody disappears, and the team leaves the pitch with something to show for its suffering. Jarrod Bowen’s post-match line that against City “you need to be perfect without the ball” captured the performance neatly, and his praise for Hermansen and the back line was well earned. West Ham had one shot, one shot on target and one goal, but they also had organisation, emotional control and a stadium that sensed the team was giving it absolutely everything.  
From City’s side, the frustration is that the substitutes did improve the rhythm but not the outcome. Doku immediately gave them more one-against-one menace, Cherki added imagination between the lines, and later introductions for Phil Foden and Tijjani Reijnders kept the pressure building. In another season, or maybe in another version of this City side, that last half-hour ends with two more goals and everyone talking about champions who know how to suffocate hope. This version looks a little different. It still has quality, still has control, still creates volume, but it no longer always has that sense of inevitability. The build-up can become ponderous, the final pass slightly delayed, the finish slightly anxious. Haaland embodied that tension. He remained involved, remained dangerous in flashes, but there was visible irritation in his game and a lack of the ruthless certainty that once made every half-chance against West Ham feel pre-scored. Guardiola, watching from the stands while serving his touchline ban, insisted afterwards that “it’s not over” because City did not lose. Mathematically, that is true. Emotionally, it felt like a draw that took a great bite out of the season.  
What makes the result so interesting is that it can be read in two completely different ways depending on where you stand. For City, it felt like one of those nights when title races drift away not with a bang but with a low, irritating hiss. They were better than West Ham in almost every category, but football does not award points for territorial superiority or artistic insistence. For West Ham, it felt like a result that says something encouraging about the direction of travel under Nuno. This was not chaos, not luck alone, and not one of those desperate draws built on random blocks and blind clearances. It was organised, purposeful and hard-earned. City left with the numbers. West Ham left with the point, the momentum and a place outside the relegation zone. In March, that is the sort of trade every struggling side would take in a heartbeat.  

Arsenal 2-0 Everton: Arsenal Leave It Late, But Everton Show Just How Far They Have Come

For 88 minutes this was not the story Arsenal wanted to tell. It was the story Everton were writing for them.

Yes, Arsenal won 2-0. Yes, Max Dowman ended the evening by making Premier League history. Yes, Mikel Arteta’s substitutes changed the game and may yet have changed the mood of a title run. But if this is going to be an honest reflection of what happened at the Emirates, then Everton have to be given their due. This was not a meek away performance from a side hanging on for dear life. This was a proper, brave, organised, aggressive Everton display that created chances, tested David Raya, rattled the post, frustrated the league leaders and looked for long spells like a team that fully believed it could take something from north London.

That, in itself, says a lot about where Everton are now under David Moyes.

Arsenal had the ball, the territory and the crowd behind them, but Everton had the sharper edge in the first half whenever they broke through the lines. Arsenal started with the usual authority, pinning Everton back and asking questions. Noni Madueke forced a save, Riccardo Calafiori volleyed over, Bukayo Saka was heavily involved, and there was that familiar sense of Arsenal circling the box waiting for the opening. But Everton were not there to admire them. They were there to disrupt, to compete, and to make the game uncomfortable.

The biggest moments of the first half belonged to Everton. Iliman Ndiaye forced Raya into a fingertip save and from the loose ball Dwight McNeil should have had more joy were it not for Calafiori throwing out a crucial block. McNeil then went even closer, smashing the post from distance, with Ndiaye unable to turn in the rebound. Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall also made Raya work with a diving save. Those were not token moments. Those were real opportunities. For all of Arsenal’s possession, it was Everton who were carrying the greater threat when the game opened up. That mattered because it exposed the difference between sterile control and genuine danger.

Everton also deserve credit for the way they defended the structure of the game. They narrowed spaces, protected central areas, and made Arsenal work in front of them. Jordan Pickford, before the cruel late twist, was again important. Arsenal had volume, Everton had resistance. Arsenal had shots, Everton had substance. There is a difference. Too often in recent years Everton have gone away to elite sides looking beaten before kick-off, almost waiting for pressure to turn into damage. This was not that. This was an Everton side that had a go, stayed organised, and looked like it understood the assignment.

That is why the defeat will sting Moyes, because this was one of those away performances where you can make a real case that Everton deserved something. He said afterwards that his side were good enough for a result, and it is hard to argue. They worked, they ran, they defended with courage, and they also created enough chances to score at least once. When Moyes pointed out that Raya made big saves and Everton hit the post, he was not reaching for excuses. He was describing the match.

It also has to be said that Everton did this without their preferred defensive pairing. Both James Tarkowski and Jarrad Branthwaite were absent, and that matters enormously. Arsenal can lose quality and call upon a bench worth millions and millions. Everton lose two first-choice centre-backs and the margin for error becomes tiny. Even so, they still made Arsenal sweat, still made them anxious, and still took the game into the final minutes at 0-0. As for Branthwaite, the clearest recent Everton updates available before this match traced his season-long fitness issues back to hamstring trouble. The match reporting after full-time confirmed he was missing again, though the post-match sources I checked did not clearly set out a fresh diagnosis for this specific absence. Either way, Everton were without him, and they felt it in depth if not always in organisation.

That is where the wider point about Everton’s progress comes in. This team is not finished. Not remotely. In truth, Moyes is still at the scaffolding stage. He came back to Everton in January 2025, and while technically that means he has now worked through three transfer windows if you count that emergency January, it is fairer to say he has only really had two proper recruitment phases to shape the squad in his own image, plus one mid-season repair job. That is nowhere near enough to build what he will ultimately want. Arteta, by contrast, was appointed in December 2019, and this current cycle is his 13th transfer window. That is the difference in the maturity of the two projects. Arsenal are deep into construction, furnishing the house and choosing the wallpaper. Everton are still pouring concrete in places and discovering which walls need knocking down.

And yet, despite that gulf in development time, Everton made Arsenal look ordinary for long stretches.

That is why the ending felt so brutal for the visitors and so revealing for the home side. Arteta’s changes did not merely freshen Arsenal up. They altered the rhythm, the speed and the threat level of the game. He had already been forced into one change when Jurriën Timber went off in the first half, but the key tactical swing came later. On came Gabriel Martinelli and Viktor Gyokeres just after the hour. Later came Piero Hincapie and, most importantly, Dowman. Suddenly Arsenal had more direct running, more urgency, more bodies attacking the right spaces and more chaos in Everton’s box. Until then Arsenal had looked a little laboured, a little safe, a little like a team trying to solve the game with neatness alone. Once the bench arrived in waves, it became a different contest.

Dowman was the lightning strike. There is no point dressing it up. He changed everything.

At 16, he came on and played as if the occasion belonged to him. That is the startling part. Not merely the age, not merely the headline, but the lack of hesitation. Every touch was positive. Every carry was aggressive. Every action had intent. He did not enter the game to participate in it politely. He entered the game to bend it. His cross for the first goal created the chaos Everton had resisted all night. Pickford came, did not claim, the ball broke kindly after a deflection, and Gyokeres had the simplest of finishes. It was messy, but only because Dowman had injected the kind of sharp, fearless delivery Arsenal had been missing.

Then came the second goal, the one that turned a big moment into a historic one. With Pickford up for an Everton corner in stoppage time, the game cracked open, but Dowman still had an awful lot to do. Young players can panic there. Young players can overrun it, snatch at it, get swallowed by the noise of the moment. Dowman did the opposite. He drove forward with a startling calmness, carried the ball over distance and finished to become the youngest goalscorer in Premier League history. The lovely twist, depending on your allegiance, is that he took that record from James Vaughan, another Everton teenager once announced to the world in blue. Football has a wicked sense of poetry sometimes.

Arteta, to his credit, deserves huge praise here. He can often be painted as a manager who trusts the structure more than instinct, but this was an instinctive call and a brave one. The easy option with a title race tightening is to stay safe, trust the senior players, and hope your stars find the answer. Instead Arteta looked to a 16-year-old and found the answer there. That is not small management. That is big management. Arsenal’s bench did not just rescue the points, it showed why their squad is in a different place now. Gyokeres gave them a presence. Martinelli added drive. Hincapie’s involvement unsettled Everton. Dowman electrified the whole stadium. Even the crowd changed once he got on the ball. Arsenal suddenly looked less like a side worrying about the weight of the moment and more like one willing to grab it by the throat.

That does not mean Everton should walk away feeling sorry for themselves. They should walk away annoyed, because they were good. But they should also walk away with evidence. Evidence that the shape is improving. Evidence that the team can execute a plan against elite opposition. Evidence that they can go to the best side in the country, or close to it, and not look second-rate. Everton are not the finished article, and that is the key point. Moyes is not building this in a single summer and he is certainly not building it in two proper windows. He probably does need five, six, maybe seven windows to get the squad where it truly needs to be. He needs more pace in certain areas, more craft between the lines, more depth at centre-back, more attacking options who can turn strong performances into goals. But the direction of travel is clear. Everton no longer feel like a side desperately trying to survive games. They increasingly look like a side learning how to compete in them.

The Arsenal comparison only sharpens that thought. Arteta has had the time, the backing and the repeated windows to mould this team into one that can change a match from the bench. Everton are not there yet. They cannot be there yet. But what they produced at the Emirates was the sort of performance that suggests the gap can narrow over time if the recruitment is smart and the patience holds.

Moyes said his team deserved something. Arteta said Dowman changed the game. Both managers were right.

That is the truth of it. Everton played well enough to take a point, perhaps more if they had been cleaner with their best moments. Arsenal, however, had the one luxury Everton do not yet possess in the same way: game-changing options arriving late with enough quality to distort the match. That is what title-contending squads do. They survive a difficult evening, then pull a rabbit, a ferret and a firework from the bench.

And in Dowman’s case, they pulled out a child prodigy with ice in his veins.

Skip to content Skip to content