Add Listing

A man who caused chaos on a transatlantic flight to London has been banned from travelling abroad for six months after being restrained by cabin crew mid-air.

Simon Jones, 51, from Willington in Bedfordshire, was handcuffed after shouting, swearing, and pacing up and down the cabin on a flight from the United States to Heathrow on 23 May. Uxbridge Magistrates’ Court heard that his behaviour escalated so severely that the captain authorised crew to physically restrain him.

Prosecutor Ashleigh Ettienne told the court that Jones began showing signs of agitation before the plane even left the runway. During the pre-flight safety demonstration, he was “clapping” and “talking very loudly,” causing alarm among nearby passengers. When approached by crew members, he became confrontational, swearing at them after being denied a glass for his drink.

As the flight continued, Jones repeatedly got up from his seat, disturbing passengers and shouting abuse at the person next to him, who eventually asked to be moved. The captain instructed that Jones was not to be served any more alcohol, but this only made him angrier. “He became irate, gritting his teeth and pacing up and down the cabin,” Ms Ettienne said.

At one point, Jones sat on the section of the aircraft door connected to the emergency slide and refused to move when told it was unsafe. He then began shouting at other passengers before arguing again with cabin crew. The captain gave permission for him to be restrained, and handcuffs were applied to secure him in his seat.

Even while restrained, Jones continued to make threats. According to the prosecution, he shouted at one crew member, “Oi blonde boy, loosen them cuffs or I’ll wrap them around your neck.” Crew were required to check on him every 15 minutes until landing, significantly disrupting their duties and affecting service to other passengers.

Defence barrister Gurbinder Tamana told the court that Jones suffers from bipolar disorder and had not been taking his prescribed medication at the time of the flight. “During that period in his life, he was having a difficult time,” she said. “He accepts his behaviour was completely out of character. He’s now on new medication and is in stable employment working in a bar.”

Ms Tamana said her client had only consumed one alcoholic drink on the flight and that the combination of stress, mental health struggles, and missed medication likely contributed to his behaviour.

Jones had previously pleaded guilty to several offences, including using threatening or abusive language toward crew, behaving in a disorderly manner, and intentionally interfering with crew duties.

Sentencing him, District Judge Kathryn Verghis said his conduct had caused distress and disruption from “the very start of the flight” and described his behaviour towards both crew and passengers as “completely unacceptable.”

Jones was given a 12-month community order, ordered to complete 150 hours of unpaid work, and attend 20 rehabilitation activity days. He must also pay £400 in costs, £114 in victim surcharge, and £150 in compensation to a fellow passenger. Additionally, he has been banned from flying internationally for six months.

A man accused of encouraging terrorism after posting thousands of extremist messages during the Covid-19 pandemic has told a jury that he “fell down a rabbit hole” of conspiracy theories and paranoia, describing his online activity as “twaddle” and “gibberish.”

Paul Martin, 60, from South Norwood in Northern Croydon, is on trial at the Old Bailey accused of using an encrypted Telegram group called The Resistance UK to promote violence and rebellion during the pandemic. Prosecutors allege that between 2020 and 2021 he posted more than 16,000 messages that called for “the use of explosives, serious violence and disruption” to influence the government and intimidate the public.

The group’s discussions revolved around Covid-19 restrictions, lockdown measures, and anti-vaccine conspiracy theories. Members shared false claims about the virus, the government’s response, and vaccine safety. Martin is said to have been one of the most prolific contributors, encouraging others to resist what he described as “tyrannical” state control.

However, giving evidence in his defence this week, Martin portrayed himself as a man who became lost in a blur of isolation, fear, and alcohol during the pandemic. Speaking calmly in the witness box, he told defence barrister Dominic Thomas that his posts were the product of stress, boredom, and “a kind of delusion” rather than any genuine intent to cause harm.

“I fell down a rabbit hole,” Martin said. “I was just talking twaddle. I was saying things in my mind and writing them down as I thought them. There was a lot of bravado in those groups — a lot of people saying extreme things that they didn’t really mean. It was nonsense.”

Martin admitted to being deeply influenced by conspiracy theories circulating online during the pandemic. He told the jury that he genuinely believed at one stage that the Covid vaccines were part of a sinister plot to control or harm people. In one of his Telegram posts, he described the vaccines as “a poison designed to kill you off over a short period” and claimed that 5G mobile signals would trigger a “kill shot” after the second jab.

Reflecting on those views in court, Martin said: “It seems ridiculous now, but at the time I thought it was possible. I thought we were heading in a dangerous direction. I was frightened that we’d lose the right to say no — that people would be dragged out of their houses and forced to take it.”

When asked by Judge Richard Marks KC if he truly believed he could be “physically manhandled out of [his] home and forced to take the vaccine,” Martin replied: “I thought it was a possibility. It gave me scary thoughts. Everything I was seeing on the news seemed to point that way.”

The jury heard that Martin’s social isolation and heavy drinking may have worsened his mental state. During lockdown, he rarely left his flat and consumed large amounts of alcohol. “I suppose I’d drink a whole bottle of rum in one sitting,” he told the court. “Not every day — my kidneys couldn’t take that — but often enough. I lost track of time. I wouldn’t know if it was Monday or Sunday.”

Police raided his home in 2021 and found a stun gun, two crossbows, and a pair of small pistols. Martin has admitted owning the stun gun but insists the other items were harmless and kept for recreational use. “The crossbows were purely for sport,” he said. “The pistols were the sort you find at fairgrounds — they weren’t proper weapons.”

Photos of his flat taken at the time of his arrest showed rooms piled high with boxes, electrical equipment, and household clutter. Martin told the court he was “a hoarder” and had been sleeping on his sofa because there was no room in his bedroom.

Under cross-examination, he acknowledged that some of his messages on The Resistance UK group appeared to glorify violence. In one post, he wrote: “Not in my lifetime. I will go to arms.” Asked by his defence lawyer whether he ever intended to act on such words, Martin replied: “No, of course not. I’ve never hurt anyone. I was just typing my thoughts — talking nonsense.”

He told the jury that while he had sometimes fantasised about “standing up” to authority, he had no real intention of committing violence. “I don’t even like confrontation,” he said. “The most aggressive thing I’ve ever done is play paintball.”

The case has drawn attention to the darker corners of online discourse during the pandemic, when misinformation, fear, and isolation fuelled a rise in extremist narratives. Prosecutors argue that Martin crossed the line from free expression into the active encouragement of terrorism, while his defence maintains that his posts were the incoherent ramblings of a man struggling with loneliness and poor mental health.

As the trial continues, the jury will have to decide whether Martin’s words represented a credible threat or a case of online bluster taken too far.

HMP Wandsworth is still “inhumane and unfit for purpose”, according to the Independent Monitoring Board (IMB) 2024/25 report.

While there are encouraging sign that the the scandal-hit South West London prison has begun improving, the Victorian-era Category B men’s prison continues to face serious challenges, with staffing shortages and overcrowding at the heart of its ongoing issues.

Built in 1851 as the Surrey House of Correction, Wandsworth was originally designed according to the separate system principle, with individual cells and in-cell toilet facilities. These toilets were removed to increase capacity, and prisoners were required to “slop out” until 1996, highlighting a long history of adapting facilities to meet the needs of an expanding population. Today, the prison holds between 1,300 and 1,500 men, far above its intended capacity, with more than 90 per cent of prisoners sharing cells built for single occupancy.

Staffing continues to be the most urgent issue at Wandsworth. The IMB found that the prison often operates with fewer than 85 officers on duty to manage almost 1,500 men, with officers frequently absent, inexperienced or demotivated. This shortage affects every aspect of prison life: prisoners are regularly locked in cramped cells for up to 22 hours a day, limiting opportunities for exercise, showers, access to the kiosk, educational activities, and even basic healthcare. The report stressed that without fundamental changes to staffing and infrastructure, the prison will remain “inhumane and unfit for purpose.”

Conditions at the historic prison remain harsh. Broken windows, ageing buildings, and hot water pipes running through cells contribute to dangerously cold winters and uncomfortably hot summers. Inadequate ventilation has encouraged mould and vermin, further undermining safety and hygiene. While violence has fallen from previous years—with prisoner-on-staff assaults dropping from 518 to 354, and prisoner-on-prisoner assaults from 442 to 360—the prison still struggles with self-harm incidents, totalling 726 cases involving 261 men, down from 998 incidents the previous year.

Recent security improvements were prompted by the infamous escape of Daniel Abed Khalife in September 2023. Khalife, a former British Army network engineer accused of spying for Iran, escaped Wandsworth while on remand in a chef’s uniform, using bedsheet strapping to attach himself to the underside of a food delivery van. The escape sparked a nationwide police search, including airport and port security alerts, and prompted a review of the prison’s procedures. Khalife was captured three days later in Northolt and later convicted of spying for Iran, receiving a sentence of 14 years and three months in February 2025. The incident revealed 81 security failings at Wandsworth, which have since been reduced to three “significant” and one “critical” issues, all of which were addressed immediately.

The prison’s troubled reputation is not new. Wandsworth has been the site of 135 executions between 1878 and 1961, with the last executions taking place in 1961. Historically, it has been associated with corporal punishment, overcrowding, and prison reform attempts that have repeatedly fallen short. In more recent decades, scandals have included staff misconduct, drug smuggling, and failures in reform programmes. Despite temporary improvements under the Prison and Safety Reform of 2016, many of the promised changes failed to materialise fully on the ground, leaving prisoners and staff with limited support.

The IMB report praised new leadership at the prison for beginning to address some long-term problems, noting a “sense of strategic direction” and a cautious recovery. However, it emphasised that consistent staffing is essential to maintain safety and provide an adequate regime for prisoners. On average, a third of staff are absent daily, making routine operations challenging and creating additional stress for those on duty.

HMP Wandsworth also offers educational and training programmes, two gyms, a sports hall, and a large multi-faith chaplaincy catering to Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Sikh, Hindu, Buddhist, Mormon, and Jehovah’s Witness prisoners. Despite these facilities, the lack of adequate staffing and prisoner engagement often limits access, leaving many inmates idle for long periods. Drug abuse remains a serious problem, with cannabis openly smoked and harder drugs circulating, compounded by allegations of staff corruption.

Prison reform advocates, including Glyn Travis of the Prison Officers Association, have expressed concern over the prison’s lost reform status. Travis stated that staff had previously engaged positively with reforms under former governors, but changing government agendas and inconsistent investment have left the prison vulnerable once again. Critics also point to insufficient use of body scanners and limited anti-ligature equipment for staff, despite several suicides in recent years.

The Ministry of Justice has pledged further investment of up to £300 million to improve conditions at Wandsworth and other prisons, alongside measures to increase staffing levels and enhance security. A spokesperson confirmed that while progress is being made, more work is required to make the prison safe, secure, and humane for both staff and prisoners.

HMP Wandsworth remains a microcosm of broader challenges within the UK prison system: overcrowding, inadequate staffing, ageing infrastructure, and complex security risks. While the prison has begun to recover from its lowest points, including improvements in violence reduction and operational oversight, inspectors warn that the journey towards a fully humane and functional prison environment is far from complete. Without sustained investment, staffing reforms, and infrastructure upgrades, Wandsworth is likely to continue facing serious criticisms and operational challenges for years to come.

Only two Metropolitan Police stations open to the public around the clock, as ten more front counters are set to close

These cost cutting moves mark a major shift in accessibility, reducing the number of police counters operating across the capital from 37 to 27. Under the new plan, most front counters will open only between 10:00 and 22:00 on weekdays and 09:00 to 19:00 at weekends.

Lewisham and Charing Cross will be the only front desk positions that remain open 24 hours a day. The latter is currently under scrutiny, with ten officers based there being investigated by the police watchdog.

The closures form part of a wider drive by the Met to save £260 million, which will also involve cutting about 1,700 officer and staff roles.

The force says the decision will save £7 million and free up 2,900 hours of police officer time each month.

Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist said the Met “is having to shrink to live within its means,” adding that the force must focus its limited resources on the public’s top priorities.

Around 5% of crime is currently reported at front counters, which equates to approximately 50,000 of the one million crimes reported annually in London. Despite this, critics argue the closures will leave some Londoners without vital face-to-face contact at moments of crisis.

The decision has reignited a long-running debate about the accessibility of policing in the capital. London Mayor Sadiq Khan had previously pledged to maintain at least one 24-hour front counter in each of London’s 32 boroughs. Responding to the new plans, he said he had “resisted closing front counters unless we really had to,” describing it as an operational policing decision that was made possible only with “record-breaking funding from City Hall.”

The changes continue a trend that has seen the steady decline of physical police access points. In 2013, London had nearly 140 front counters. Boris Johnson’s tenure as mayor, 65 were closed, followed by another 38 closures in 2017 under Sadiq Khan. The Met had previously committed to maintaining at least one counter per borough open 24 hours a day as part of its A New Met for London strategy, but that commitment will no longer stand.

The force has said that Londoners will still be able to report crimes and book appointments through other means, including video calls, online reporting, and by phone via 999 and 101.

Phones will also be installed outside closed stations for emergencies.

However, victim support groups have raised serious concerns that these measures will not effectively replace the reassurance of face-to-face contact.

A staff member, identified only as Nick due to job security concerns, told BBC London that counters are “always busy,” with officers often called in to cover shifts.

He described the front desk as an essential refuge for the public, adding: “It could be just somewhere safe to be if they think someone’s following them. If you’re removing a vital service for the people of London, and you’re saying, ‘trust us’, it’s like, ‘how can we trust you when you’re removing something we all need?’”

Criticism has also come from the London Assembly’s Police and Crime Committee.

Gareth Roberts, a Liberal Democrat member, said the London police station closures would have “real world consequences for hundreds, if not thousands, of Londoners,” particularly for vulnerable groups such as the elderly, non-English speakers, and those without internet access.

Domestic abuse charity Refuge echoed these concerns, warning that survivors who rely on walk-in access to report abuse may find themselves with no safe way to reach the police. “If someone is walking by a police station and they’ve built up the courage to go in, I don’t think we should be putting up additional barriers,” said Emma Pickering, the charity’s head of tech-facilitated abuse.

As part of the plans, stations in Barking, Chingford, Harrow, Kensington, Mitcham, Pinner, Royalty Studios, Twickenham, and Wimbledon will all lose their front counters.

The Met insists the closures are necessary to protect frontline policing, and statistically this is an artery for only a small volume of total crime reporting, but for many Londoners, the shrinking physical presence of the police raises deep questions about safety, trust, and visibility in the heart of the city.